Creek woes may hit taxpayers

Friday, March 21, 2008

 

BY DAVID DEKOK AND DIANA FISHLOCK

Of The Patriot-News

 

A proposed environmental cleanup effort could cost five Dauphin County communities millions of dollars.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said the Paxton Creek watershed, which includes Wildwood Lake, is impaired by phosphate and sediment pollution. The agency has proposed stricter discharge limits that would begin between two and eight years from now.

 

The cost to residents of Harrisburg and Penbrook, and Susquehanna, Lower Paxton and Swatara townships might be substantial, said sources familiar with the situation.

 

"I've been eagerly looking forward to it for years, frankly," said E. Drannon Buskirk Jr., of West Hanover Twp., founder of the nonprofit Paxton Creek Watershed and Education Association. "We've been working on this problem for five years, with all the runoff."

 

Phosphates in the environment come from sources including dish detergent and runoff from farms, yards and golf courses, scientists said. About 5,900 pounds of phosphates per year go into the Paxton Creek watershed, and the new maximum limit is 978 pounds, EPA said.

 

Sediment can come from farms -- although there are few, if any, left in the watershed -- and from development, of which there is much.

 

Part of the phosphate problem could disappear after July 1, 2010, when manufacturers must switch to dish detergents with no more than 0.5 percent phosphates.

Dennis Griesing, a spokesman for the Soap and Detergent Association in Washington, D.C., said up to 8.7 percent phosphates are allowed in household detergents now.

 

The EPA report pointed to the Harrisburg Authority sewage treatment plant as a problem.

Harrisburg's old-style combined sewage and stormwater system has 31 discharge points into Paxton Creek, the EPA said. During heavy rainfall, volume can exceed the system's capacity, sending untreated sewage into the creek.

EPA said the five municipalities must reduce phosphate discharges by an average 84.2 percent, but doesn't say how it must be done.

 

Bill Cluck, an environmental lawyer in Harrisburg who monitors Chesapeake Bay issues for the Harrisburg Regional Chamber, said the most costly option would be requiring the Harrisburg Authority to separate its storm and sanitary sewer lines.

In addition, the authority faces the cost of meeting state requirements to reduce phosphate and nutrient discharges into the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

 

Fifty-four midstate municipalities have expressed unhappiness with the cost of their Chesapeake Bay upgrades by joining a lawsuit against the state Department of Environmental Protection.

 

The EPA held a lightly attended meeting Wednesday night seeking public comment on the proposed Paxton Creek limits.

Although the meeting was advertised, the EPA did not notify municipal officials, said Lower Paxton Twp. manager George Wolfe, who learned of the meeting from a consultant. He contacted officials in Harrisburg and the other municipalities.

"This hasn't been handled well," he said.

 

Cluck said the public comment deadline is April 3, but the Harrisburg Builders Association has requested a two-week extension. A final EPA report on the new limits is expected at the end of June.

 

John Luciew contributed to this report. DIANA FISHLOCK: 255-8251 or dfishlock@patriot-news.com DAVID DEKOK: 255-8173 or ddekok@patriot-news.com

 

TO COMMENT

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is seeking public comment through April 3 on establishing strict pollution limits for the Paxton Creek watershed. To comment, contact Lenka Berlin at berlin.lenka@epa.gov For more information, visit www.epa.gov/ reg3wapd/tmdl/pa_tmdl/ PaxtonCreek3-4-08/index.html or www.paxtoncreek.org.